Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

If you have an idea for improving the product, please post it here and we will try and prioritize updates based on the most popular requests.
User avatar
FTMSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 13193
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by FTMSupport » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:35 am

For #1, we color code strikes swinging vs looking, and mark fouls as an F. The hit ball is always the last pitch (which would not be listed as it is implied). The only thing not shown is the Wild Pitch, but that is something we could easily add to the existing scorecard with more color coding.

For #2, we always show how the batter made it to the bases by putting the indication on the baseline.

Let us know if you have any further suggestions. Thank you.
raether
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by raether » Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:08 pm

I understand all the information is there, the visual presentation is just not as appealing as in the situational scoring. Bottom-line I want to get the stats out the door quickly, so the scoresheet becomes less important to me. I know this thread is about the alternate scoresheet priority. I would love to see Alex's method of scoring (and even willing to pay more money). But, it is obvious this is being given a very low priority.
User avatar
CSThunderCoach
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:55 am
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by CSThunderCoach » Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:51 pm

Margin for hole punch:

This is possible using print-preview in Acrobat. Adjust the margins and then set the scaling factor to something that allows the chart to print on a single page. You only need to change the left margin to something on the order of .4 or .5 inches. You can also adjust the right margin to .15 for laser printers (.20 for others). It does not change the overall size of the printout enough to be noticeable. I do something similar, but I hole punch at the top and just adjust the top and bottom margins.
User avatar
brentwalker
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Houston Area

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by brentwalker » Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:44 pm

CSThunder Coach, was your post here actually meant for this thread? Seems out of place, unless I am missing something.
danmcc
Posts: 834
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:43 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by danmcc » Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:48 pm

Brent,
Last post on page one requested room for holes from hole punch.
User avatar
brentwalker
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Houston Area

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by brentwalker » Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:26 pm

Ah
raether
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Must Have Priority for Alternate Scorecard Format

Post by raether » Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:38 am

CSThunderCoach wrote:Margin for hole punch:

This is possible using print-preview in Acrobat. Adjust the margins and then set the scaling factor to something that allows the chart to print on a single page. You only need to change the left margin to something on the order of .4 or .5 inches. You can also adjust the right margin to .15 for laser printers (.20 for others). It does not change the overall size of the printout enough to be noticeable. I do something similar, but I hole punch at the top and just adjust the top and bottom margins.

I will give it a try. Thanks for the tip.
Post Reply